Sunday, October 26, 2014
Saturday, September 6, 2014
Nana Akufo-Addo Is A Corrupt Individual! Part One
Nana
Akufo-Addo Is A Corrupt Individual! Part One
By Nana Akyea Mensah, The OdikroThose of us who are worried about the slippery slope into political violence simply because a certain individual wants to be President "at all costs" must begin to raise our voices before it is too late! These series of articles must be seen as my personal contribution to help make sure that sanity prevails in our country before we descend into civil strife and possibly war. It is a humble call on all peace-loving Ghanaians to stand up and be counted!
I am particularly writing in response to the bullying tactics and campaign of insults that are fast becoming the hallmark of the Akufo-Addo campaign and to call the bluff of Mr. Mustapha Hamid, aide to Mr. Akufo-Addo, over his vituperative and intemperate attack on Dr. Arthur Kennedy's call for "a united party that has dealt with corruption and violence and intimidation". See "Arthur K is on a mission to destroy Akufo-Addo – Mustapha Hamid".
Certainly Dr. Arthur Kennedy must know a thing or two about corruption within the NPP in which Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo has been involved. The fact that he is not pointing them out directly does not mean there is nothing to worry about! I have every intention to address the issue squarely, even if takes a series of ten parts. This is only the beginning.
Dr. Kennedy still remains a party faithful and is not expected to wash the dirty clothes of the NPP in public. But at this stage, his silence on what he knows might be a disservice to God and country. I shall have the time to deal this this aspect in a later series. For now, suffice it to say that I have read carefully his statement calling for sanity to prevail in the party. The spirit of intolerance currently reigning in the NPP will not only ensure its defeat in the 2016 elections, but might also plunge our country into political chaos.
First of all, I wish to thank in advance, all those party sycophants who are quite predictably going to jump at me and insult and annoy me because they will only help to give me fuel to produce the second part of this article with maximum alacrity. The knee-jerk response to the slightest criticism of Nana Akufo-Addo with insults and unwarranted attacks and intimidation is exactly what I am complaining about. And it must be clear to all that Nana Akyea Mensah will not be intimidated!
The systematic attempts by Akufo-Addo's aides to insult and intimidate his opponents and critics is certainly not the best way to defend our democracy. I find it most unfortunate that in all these, Nana Akufo-Addo himself has remained silent, instead of calling his aides to order. Our democracy must not give way to school-yard bullies! It is absolutely important for our democracy to make sure that political candidates endeavour to win elections by the force of their arguments and not by the argument of force.
Apart from the insults, the only Presidential candidate whose body guards have been known to beat up opponents is none other than Nana Akufo-Addo! We all know his personal body guards were seen beating up those of the late President Atta-Mills' at the Oguaa Fetu Afahye in 2008. They were seen beating up former President Rawlings cameraman in a hotel lobby in Kumasi, with Akufo-Addo looking on approvingly! The unfortunate trend still continues to this day. Is it too much to ask that this must stop?
It is a shame that the only occasion where Nana Addo has been on record to condemn these senseless attacks was when they beat up Mr. Alan Kyeremanteng's supporters at the NPP headquarters. They went ahead to beat up President Mills' body guards again at the Manhyia Palace during the 2008 Odwira Festival, under the pretext that a body guard was carrying a gun. What kind of logic is that? Were they expecting body guards to carry bananas?
There is no doubt in my mind that had Dr. Kennedy said what he was saying in the presence of Akufo-Addo's body guards, he would have been severely beaten, and Nana Akufo-Addo would have most probably approved of it! In the lead-up to the 2012 elections, Mr. Asamoah-Boateng had to run for dear life when he attempted to pay a courtesy call at Nana Addo's "Victroy 2012" headquarters. They charged at him on sight, screaming, "Agenda 2016"! "Agenda 2016"! "Agenda 2016"!
Even the current chairperson of the NPP, Mr Paul Afoko, has already received this "baptism of fire" from Nana Akufo-Addo's henchmen, as they generously doled out a fair share of their severe beatings for daring to challenge their boss! A party that cannot tolerate any form of criticism is a political dictatorship and not a political party! What was so wrong with the wise counsel of Dr. Kennedy? If indeed the NPP really means to win an election in Ghana, then they need to heed this call: "The truth is that" Dr. Kennedy writes, "the NPP brand has been tarnished by divisions and violence and intemperate talk since 2008. To win, If he becomes the nominee, he needs a united party that has dealt with corruption and violence and intimidation behind him. To get there, he has huge mountains to climb."
We know very well about Mr. Akufo-Addo's reputation for violence and intimidation, so the least said about this "all die be die" individual, the shorter this article would be. I do not intend to labour the point. However, the spin Mr. Hamid is trying to put on Akufo-Addo as being incorruptible cannot pass without comment. He ought to have let sleeping dogs lie! I have decided to focus on this aspect in these series of articles. Hence the title.
Mr. Mustapha Hamid was quoted as saying, “We are all human beings and may have our deficiencies but Nana Addo’s deficiencies do not include corruption, they do not include violence and they do not include exclusion,” Mr. Mustapha Hamid noted in his attack on Dr. Kennedy. He even went further to claim that Nana Akufo Addo is "unblemished when it comes to corruption".
To further buttress his point, he stated:
"As Attorney-General and later minister for Foreign Affairs, Nana Akufo-Addo, never drew one litre of fuel from government coffers, he paid for his own security, never lived in a government bungalow, paid extra from his own pocket in order to sleep in hotels when he went abroad, etcetera; those are public records at the ministries where Nana Addo served as minister".
Really? This is ridiculous! Living in a government bungalow officially designated for ministers does not make a minister corrupt! Sleeping in a hotel on official duties at government expense does not make one corrupt! It seems to me that Mr. Mustapha Hamid does not even know what constitutes corruption! This is a rare piece of nonsense. Is a minister to be considered corrupt simply because he lives in a state bungalow?
For starters, if indeed Mr. Hamid thinks what he is saying is true, then I challenge him to ask his boss to throw more light on what happened at the Hotel Hyatt & Resorts, located on 24M Streets, Nw, Washington, DC 20037, on Wednesday, June 4, 2008. I am putting it to Mr. Akufo-Addo that this is not only a closely guarded secret because it was a criminal fund-raising activity that broke both US and Ghanaian laws, but that he also used the Ghanaian tax payers' money and state resources to finance the entire fund-raising event!
And we are not talking about small money here. The whole event was organized by The Whitaker Group, lobbyists and investment promoters, which later confirmed that indeed the Government of Ghana paid it sums amounting to $1.3 million. The Whitaker Group further explained that "the money was not for lobbying on behalf of the Government only, but includes other works aimed at facilitating trade and investment to create jobs".
This was in reaction to a Ghanaweb publication on
Wednesday, June 11, 2008, an article detailing how the Government
doled out the sum, explaining that "among other things the money
went to service dinners hosted for officials of Government".
See: Whitaker
Group confirms $1.3 million payment from Government By Nana Akyea Mensah, The OdikroThose of us who are worried about the slippery slope into political violence simply because a certain individual wants to be President "at all costs" must begin to raise our voices before it is too late! These series of articles must be seen as my personal contribution to help make sure that sanity prevails in our country before we descend into civil strife and possibly war. It is a humble call on all peace-loving Ghanaians to stand up and be counted!
I am particularly writing in response to the bullying tactics and campaign of insults that are fast becoming the hallmark of the Akufo-Addo campaign and to call the bluff of Mr. Mustapha Hamid, aide to Mr. Akufo-Addo, over his vituperative and intemperate attack on Dr. Arthur Kennedy's call for "a united party that has dealt with corruption and violence and intimidation". See "Arthur K is on a mission to destroy Akufo-Addo – Mustapha Hamid".
Certainly Dr. Arthur Kennedy must know a thing or two about corruption within the NPP in which Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo has been involved. The fact that he is not pointing them out directly does not mean there is nothing to worry about! I have every intention to address the issue squarely, even if takes a series of ten parts. This is only the beginning.
Dr. Kennedy still remains a party faithful and is not expected to wash the dirty clothes of the NPP in public. But at this stage, his silence on what he knows might be a disservice to God and country. I shall have the time to deal this this aspect in a later series. For now, suffice it to say that I have read carefully his statement calling for sanity to prevail in the party. The spirit of intolerance currently reigning in the NPP will not only ensure its defeat in the 2016 elections, but might also plunge our country into political chaos.
First of all, I wish to thank in advance, all those party sycophants who are quite predictably going to jump at me and insult and annoy me because they will only help to give me fuel to produce the second part of this article with maximum alacrity. The knee-jerk response to the slightest criticism of Nana Akufo-Addo with insults and unwarranted attacks and intimidation is exactly what I am complaining about. And it must be clear to all that Nana Akyea Mensah will not be intimidated!
The systematic attempts by Akufo-Addo's aides to insult and intimidate his opponents and critics is certainly not the best way to defend our democracy. I find it most unfortunate that in all these, Nana Akufo-Addo himself has remained silent, instead of calling his aides to order. Our democracy must not give way to school-yard bullies! It is absolutely important for our democracy to make sure that political candidates endeavour to win elections by the force of their arguments and not by the argument of force.
Apart from the insults, the only Presidential candidate whose body guards have been known to beat up opponents is none other than Nana Akufo-Addo! We all know his personal body guards were seen beating up those of the late President Atta-Mills' at the Oguaa Fetu Afahye in 2008. They were seen beating up former President Rawlings cameraman in a hotel lobby in Kumasi, with Akufo-Addo looking on approvingly! The unfortunate trend still continues to this day. Is it too much to ask that this must stop?
It is a shame that the only occasion where Nana Addo has been on record to condemn these senseless attacks was when they beat up Mr. Alan Kyeremanteng's supporters at the NPP headquarters. They went ahead to beat up President Mills' body guards again at the Manhyia Palace during the 2008 Odwira Festival, under the pretext that a body guard was carrying a gun. What kind of logic is that? Were they expecting body guards to carry bananas?
There is no doubt in my mind that had Dr. Kennedy said what he was saying in the presence of Akufo-Addo's body guards, he would have been severely beaten, and Nana Akufo-Addo would have most probably approved of it! In the lead-up to the 2012 elections, Mr. Asamoah-Boateng had to run for dear life when he attempted to pay a courtesy call at Nana Addo's "Victroy 2012" headquarters. They charged at him on sight, screaming, "Agenda 2016"! "Agenda 2016"! "Agenda 2016"!
Even the current chairperson of the NPP, Mr Paul Afoko, has already received this "baptism of fire" from Nana Akufo-Addo's henchmen, as they generously doled out a fair share of their severe beatings for daring to challenge their boss! A party that cannot tolerate any form of criticism is a political dictatorship and not a political party! What was so wrong with the wise counsel of Dr. Kennedy? If indeed the NPP really means to win an election in Ghana, then they need to heed this call: "The truth is that" Dr. Kennedy writes, "the NPP brand has been tarnished by divisions and violence and intemperate talk since 2008. To win, If he becomes the nominee, he needs a united party that has dealt with corruption and violence and intimidation behind him. To get there, he has huge mountains to climb."
We know very well about Mr. Akufo-Addo's reputation for violence and intimidation, so the least said about this "all die be die" individual, the shorter this article would be. I do not intend to labour the point. However, the spin Mr. Hamid is trying to put on Akufo-Addo as being incorruptible cannot pass without comment. He ought to have let sleeping dogs lie! I have decided to focus on this aspect in these series of articles. Hence the title.
Mr. Mustapha Hamid was quoted as saying, “We are all human beings and may have our deficiencies but Nana Addo’s deficiencies do not include corruption, they do not include violence and they do not include exclusion,” Mr. Mustapha Hamid noted in his attack on Dr. Kennedy. He even went further to claim that Nana Akufo Addo is "unblemished when it comes to corruption".
To further buttress his point, he stated:
"As Attorney-General and later minister for Foreign Affairs, Nana Akufo-Addo, never drew one litre of fuel from government coffers, he paid for his own security, never lived in a government bungalow, paid extra from his own pocket in order to sleep in hotels when he went abroad, etcetera; those are public records at the ministries where Nana Addo served as minister".
Really? This is ridiculous! Living in a government bungalow officially designated for ministers does not make a minister corrupt! Sleeping in a hotel on official duties at government expense does not make one corrupt! It seems to me that Mr. Mustapha Hamid does not even know what constitutes corruption! This is a rare piece of nonsense. Is a minister to be considered corrupt simply because he lives in a state bungalow?
For starters, if indeed Mr. Hamid thinks what he is saying is true, then I challenge him to ask his boss to throw more light on what happened at the Hotel Hyatt & Resorts, located on 24M Streets, Nw, Washington, DC 20037, on Wednesday, June 4, 2008. I am putting it to Mr. Akufo-Addo that this is not only a closely guarded secret because it was a criminal fund-raising activity that broke both US and Ghanaian laws, but that he also used the Ghanaian tax payers' money and state resources to finance the entire fund-raising event!
And we are not talking about small money here. The whole event was organized by The Whitaker Group, lobbyists and investment promoters, which later confirmed that indeed the Government of Ghana paid it sums amounting to $1.3 million. The Whitaker Group further explained that "the money was not for lobbying on behalf of the Government only, but includes other works aimed at facilitating trade and investment to create jobs".
Incidentally, Dr. Kennedy was present at the luncheon as the Director of Communications of the Akufo-Addo campaign. He laconically admitted that the secret luncheon did indeed take place with a group composed of mainly US multinational corporations:
"The group", Dr. Kennedy said, "was made up of people with substantial investments in Ghana and also of others who have an interest in investing in Ghana. The meeting was therefore to afford Nana Akufo-Addo the opportunity to explain his vision of transforming the Ghanaian economy and creating a modern society. That was just what happened at the meeting". See: Rejoinder to Enquirer Story On Akufo-Addo's Trip | General News 2008-06-08
The dangers associated with big multinational corporations in the USA financing political parties in a poor third-world country like Ghana cannot be under-estimated. This is the most serious form of political corruption available on the planet! The selection of so-called "business-friendly" candidates by these corporations to "help" them win power are translated often in lower labour standards, a blind eye on vital environmental protection measures, and generally sacrificing the common good for special interests, such as the imposition of GM foods on the population without the consent of the people!
As Adam Smith (Scottish philosopher and economist, 1723-1790) once put it, "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public." The question Mr. Hamid must answer is what was Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo, who went to the US in search of funding, doing secretly in a room full of multinational corporations, some of whom have been convicted of bribery and corruption in countries as diverse as Germany and Indonesia?
Of course, you and I were not there! And your guess is as good as mine! So if Mustapha Hamid wants to tell us his boss is not corrupt, he must begin by giving us further and better particulars on this event, and stop throwing dust into our eyes on government bungalows!
Stay tuned for the Part Two.
Sincerely,
Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
OFFICE OF THE ODIKRO
a companion of the black star!
Twitter: http://twitter.com/TheOdikro
Friday, August 30, 2013
Isn't Sir John Guilty Of Another Contempt?
Feature Article, by Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
In fact, if the NPP were to properly learn the lessons of their electoral defeat, Ghana's elections will never be the same again. The “campaign” for votes through “trokosi” and “cow herd” insults, as well as the “we Akans” and “all die be die” would all disappear! Elections would be festive, entertaining, and there would be less tension. It is about time that things change for the better. Peace-loving Ghanaians are sick and tired of the fact that each time Ghana is going into elections, one feels as though our nation is preparing for a civil war. That is why it is very important to help them to learn their lessons. One way of doing so ought to be a zero tolerance for the irresponsible utterances from their elected officers. We need, as a people, to make such reckless comments a thing of the past. If we want peace to reign in Ghana, these are the little things we must pay attention to.
I
was indeed very surprised to read today, Friday, 30th August, 2013,
just a day after the Supreme Court had delivered their verdict
dismissing the Akufo-Addo-led petition, the irresponsible utterances
are beginning to show their ugly heads, once more. Newspaper reports
indicate that the General Secretary of the New Patriotic Party (NPP),
Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie, "has insinuated that President John Mahama
and the vice president may have known the election petition verdict
ahead of the pronouncement by the Supreme Court on Thursday."
See: Sir
John: Why did Mahama wear white on judgment day? | General News
2013-08-30 Source: radioxyzonline.com,
Sir
John needs to be reminded that he could be hauled again before the
court to give "further and better particulars" regarding
the insinuation "that President John Mahama and the vice
president may have known the election petition verdict ahead of the
pronouncement by the Supreme Court on Thursday," simply because
they were both dressed in white clothes before the verdict was
announced! Sir John told XYZ Breakfast Show host Moro Awudu on Friday
August 30, 2013 that: “He knows best what went into all this.
Indeed it amazes me that he and his vice president and all the people
around him wore white even in the morning before the verdict came”.
Sir John, therefore, wondered if the president and the governing
National Democratic Congress were privy to some information about the
verdict which the rest of the country did not know.
This
is not just nonsensical. This is bad behaviour especially coming from
someone who has been made to sign a bond of good behaviour! Since
"you and I were not there" when the Justices of the Supreme
Court arrived at their judgements, there is a strong inference that
the insinuation of Sir John is a direct attack on the integrity of
the Justices of the Supreme Court who are the only people supposed to
keep custody of their judgement. The best way to maintain the peace
and stability of Ghana does not include tolerating bad behaviour from
someone who is already under judicial bond to behave himself! The
statement is particularly unfortunate, since the only people who
could have supposedly divulged such information to the Presidency
would have to be the Justices of the Supreme Court! Since such an act
would clearly be deemed wrong by any right thinking Ghanaian, is Sir
John not by this assertion, directly or indirectly impugning the
integrity of the Justices of the Supreme Court?
Is
he not frontally attempting to bring the integrity of the Justices of
Supreme Court into disrepute? Sir John is no ordinary citizen of the
Ghana. Even ordinary voters are supposed to be at least, eighteen
years old and of a sound mind! Sir John is not only an elderly
person, he is also the General Secretary of the main Opposition
party. He is also a lawyer who ought to know better! Of all the
troubles our nation is facing, must this be the focus of the General
Secretary of the main Opposition party? What is even most surprising
about these utterances is that he has just been convicted of contempt
and was supposed to have signed a bond of good behaviour or risk a
jail sentence of six months! During his contempt hearing, the
President of the panel of Judges expressed some uncertainty about the
contrite nature of Sir John when he appeared before them. It was a
gesture to peace and tranquillity that Sir John was given the benefit
of the doubt and a chance to be of good behaviour.
I
was not sure myself if such an apparently incorrigible hard-core
adult delinquent of that nature could rise to the occasion, but I
understood the wisdom of the court decision. After reading Sir John's
latest outbursts, I think otherwise. The whip must crack. That seems
to be the only language people like this understand. It looks as
though Sir John will never change for the better. My greatest fear is
that if he gets off the hook, he would quickly revert to his bad old
ways. As one commentator put it, "He has said all manner of
things including saying that the President had a hand in the accident
that the running mate had up north. Indeed his wise running make came
out boldly debunking this claim of this demented and schizophrenic
wreck." What makes this particularly annoying is the fact that
Sir John asked NPP supporters to wear white even before the Electoral
Commission had finished tallying the 2012 electoral results!
“For
somebody who sought to usurp the power of the Electoral Commissioner
by pre-emptively announcing to the supporters of NPP to wear white to
church on Sunday even before all the results were for the 2012
election were in”, commented Che on Ghanaweb, “Sir John must be
living in a fool's paradise for reading all sorts of imports into the
President and his vice wearing white while waiting for the results of
the NPP court petition. There is nothing wrong with one having a
positive anticipatory result of an awaited pronouncement. In this
case the President and his vice were right while sir John's forecast
with respect to the 2012 elections were foolishly wrong. Go figure
who should be judging the other. Some kind of jealous posture by a
misguided mind like that of Sir John.” (Comment: LISTEN TO THE
IDIOT, Author: CHE, Date: 2013-08-30 10:03:25, Comment to: Sir John:
Why did Mahama wear white on judgment day).
“The
Gas wear white to mourn; how about that?” Nana Ansah also wrote as
a comment, “Waving a white flag means accepting defeat world wide.
So for this illiterate Kokoase champion to make such a fallacious
statement is no wonder because he is a Kokoase Krakye.” (Nana
Ansah, Date: 2013-08-30 08:59:10, Comment to: WHY DID NPP WEAR
BLACK?) Another commentator wrote: “But NPP supporters were also
dressed in white waiting at the party headquarters. did they know
something we did not also know?” (Comment: Nonsense, Author: Sally,
UK, Date: 2013-08-30 08:27:51, Comment to: Why did Mahama wear white
on judgment day).
It
must be instructive that a Law lecturer at the GIMPA Law
School, Ernest Kofi Abotsi says one can still fall into the trap of
contempt of court even after the judgement
on the election petition has been delivered. He said “the fact that
the court’s judgement has ended with the
slamming of the gavel does not imply that the jurisdiction of the
court” to bring contempt proceedings is ousted. Any person who
makes comments on the judgment which the court considers scandalous
and injurious to its reputation can be cited for contempt and
punished, he said. “When the court speaks and you say things about
the court that can be deemed to be scandalizing of the court, or
deemed intentional of bringing the administration of justice into
disrepute, actually this is the time, in my opinion, when contempt of
court may be looming large,” Mr. Abotsi stated. He was a panelist
on Joy FM’s Super Morning Show discussing the verdict of the
Supreme Court on the election petition. (See:
Watch! You can still be in contempt after judgment – Law lecturer
| Local News, Myjoyonline.com|Malik Abass Daabu,
August 29, 2013, 12:50 GMT)
Perhaps the best and
the most prophetic comment on this was: “You wait they will catch him
again.” - Author: SIMPLY RUTHLESS, Date: 2013-08-30 09:23:47,
Comment to: WHY DID NPP WEAR BLACK?
Comment:
“He thinks Atuguba is gone!”
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
NPP Must Learn To Say “Sorry”!
-->
“What might have changed?” he questioned: “Because you have created a scenario that has been discussed and suddenly there has been a withdrawal, assuming the relationship involved that is being discussed, the relationship hasn’t changed; assuming that there are some serious evidences that have been gotten in respect of that judge, which fundamentally prejudices him as a judge sitting in respect of this matter, has that fundamental scenario changed? I think if the status quo remains then it means that there are even more questions why in the light of status quo you would want to proceed while you feel very uncomfortable with that Judge, and what the effect might be if that judge rise to judgement you find fundamentally problematic in the light of facts that have not been disposed? So clearly there are serious perceptual issues that might have been created, and I think that is what may affect the issue of withdrawal.” [4]
REFERENCES:
Feature Article, by
Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
The NPP cannot eat
their cakes and have them at the same time. In raising an issue that
they considered fundamental, to which lawyers for the respondents and
the court agreed were very important, as they impugn the credibility
of the court. After going to town attacking the credibility of the
court, they are seeking to leave a potentially explosive matter
legally untested and leaving a room for the much talked-about
insurgency against the people of Ghana. Even though the NPP does not
seem to have the stomach to carry through their objections to the
composition of the panel, they are still publicly claiming that they
stand by their concerns, and that they “have not changed”.
Some of us thought
that the NPP was going to make sure that the right things are done,
from the very beginning of this trial to the very end. At least, that
was the impression some of us got when the NPP failed presidential
candidate, Nana Akufo-Addo announced at a Press Conference, among
other things, that:
“We have now put our
case before the court, and are also putting the case before you, the
people of Ghana. We leave it for the court to judge the merits. But
once again, the NPP, through the petitioners in this case, is seeking
to deepen our democracy by strengthening the institutions that are
mandated by our Constitution to superintend the electoral process:
(1) by ensuring that the Electoral Commission is accountable to the
people of Ghana, and (2) the Supreme Court is seen by all as the
ultimate arbiter of electoral grievances and disputes.” [1]
How can the
Supreme Court be “seen by all as the ultimate arbiter of electoral
grievances and disputes”, when this same NPP is making serious
allegations against its integrity, and at the same time insisting
that even though those concerns “have not changed”, they have not
got the time to address them, as they are more concerned with the
court concentrating on their task of declaring Nana Akufo-Addo as the
President of Ghana in an “expeditious” manner? Is it possible to
make wild accusations and refuse to substantiate simply because one
has not got the time? Even thought the petitioners have expressed the
intention not to pursue the objection to the composition of the
court, a member of the NPP legal team, Madam Gloria Akuffo
maintains publicly that the
concerns expressed by the NPP respective to a particular judge “have
not changed”. [2]
So,
if those concerns “have not changed”, what are those concerns?
According to Ms Gloria Akuffo, it was for the purpose of maintaining
the sanctity of the judiciary that the NPP requested an in-camera
hearing of its objections to the panel of judges hearing the NDC's
joinder application. "It is for the purpose of
strengthening our democracy that we thought we should adopt the
procedure...to be heard in-camera; it is for the stability of this
country; it is for the security of this country; it s to maintain the
integrity and respect for the judiciary. But if the court - they are
the final arbiters - ...think that having disclosed the nature of our
objection we should still bring it formally we will respect the
court's decision,” she said. [3]
Is
it not simply amazing that the NPP insists that their concerns which
involve serious issues such as “the security of this country”,
“maintaining the sanctity of the Judiciary”, “strengthening our
democracy”, “to maintain the integrity and respect for the
judiciary.”, no longer matter? And that what matters is simply “an
expeditious determination of the petition” in order to make Mr.
Akufo-Addo, the President of Ghana, as quickly as possible? Is the
NPP trying to tell Ghanaians and the rest of the world that our
Judiciary has nothing else to address, even where its own integrity
is at stake, other than declaring Nana Akufo-Addo as the President of
Ghana? Apparently, the President-at-all-costs, Nana Akufo-Addo can
close his eyes to any principle of fairness, and moral scruple, rule
of law, any arithmetic, any judge, any democratically elected
President, who seems to stand in the way!
What
the NPP is telling us is that they care less about their much vaunted
“the security of the state”, “the stability of this country”,
“the sanctity of the Judiciary”, etc., so far as Nana Akufo-Addo
is declared President by the Supreme Court! Otherwise, they would
have taken the time to address those issues, especially as they claim
publicly that those concerns have not changed. I fully agree with the
views of Mr Kofi Abotsi, who observed on Joy FM’s news analysis
programme Newsfile Saturday, that the practice of raising objection
to a panel member is a regular exercise in the law courts. And that
the main problem however is that the party could have exercised some
sober reflection on the matter, before raising an objection:
“What might have changed?” he questioned: “Because you have created a scenario that has been discussed and suddenly there has been a withdrawal, assuming the relationship involved that is being discussed, the relationship hasn’t changed; assuming that there are some serious evidences that have been gotten in respect of that judge, which fundamentally prejudices him as a judge sitting in respect of this matter, has that fundamental scenario changed? I think if the status quo remains then it means that there are even more questions why in the light of status quo you would want to proceed while you feel very uncomfortable with that Judge, and what the effect might be if that judge rise to judgement you find fundamentally problematic in the light of facts that have not been disposed? So clearly there are serious perceptual issues that might have been created, and I think that is what may affect the issue of withdrawal.” [4]
I
find it very alarming that the NPP claims it insists on their
objections raised, even though they have no wish to contest the case,
no matter how important this might be. Is this case going to proceed
with the NPP hinting at unsubstantiated objections to the composition
of the court, even though their concerns “have not changed”? It
makes me wonder how a case that was specifically adjourned with a
court order to file a motion, issued after the lawyers for the New
Patriotic Party protested the composition of the court, can now go
ahead on the grounds of “an expeditious determination of the
petition”, despite the seriousness of their objections, most
especially considering fact that they claim to be still standing by
those concerns?
They
argued that the composition of the court, presided over by Justice
Atuguba, is skewed against them. Nothing has changed. They still
insist they are right to impugn the credibility and integrity of the
Supreme Court. There are nine Supreme Court judges sitting on the
case. NPP was expected to file a motion to state their case. After
storming out of court screaming furiously that they were going to
work on their motion, all that came out was a letter declaring an
intent “not to pursue the matter”. What does that mean? This is
even worse than a simple inability to substantiate a case of
defamation. Is the NPP trying to tell the court, they are incapable
of executing their order to file a petition, even though they still
believe that the composition of the court, presided over by Justice
Atuguba, is skewed against them?
Is
it a way of saying, “My Lords, you are biased, we insist on that,
but carry on judging because we are in a hurry, and we have no time
to substantiate our wild allegations!”? Where did they acquire
their sense of decency and this type of arrogance? It is very
alarming that instead of pursuing their motion in court, the NPP has
resorted to media propaganda aimed at undermining the credibility of
the Panel of Judges, especially Justice William Atuguba. Only today,
Tuesday, 15 January 2013, a group calling itself Militant Patriots
of Ghana (MPs) issued a statement which stated among others:
“We, of the Militant
Patriots of Ghana (MPs) have been watching with unease the recent
turn of events at the Supreme Court where a judge, Justice William
Atuguba made comments which can only be described as highly reckless
and prejudicial. By these comments, the said judge has left himself
no other alternative than to recuse himself from the case involving
Nana Akufo-Addo and others v John Mahama and EC. We are confident
that, with the benefit of hindsight, Justice William Atuguba himself
will have come to the conclusion that his extra-ordinary outburst was
ill-conceived, misleading and a serious error of judgement. In that
vein he therefore cannot continue to serve as a judge on this matter.
If he has any iota of conscience left, then he should recuse himself.
The statement that “this country is solid but is breaking down
because principles are being chopped down… This is not good” is
in bad taste. Such definitive, conclusive and judgmental statements
are normally reserved for end of trials and not at the beginning of
trials. How can Justice Atuguba serve as a judge in the light of such
definitive statements? We find this as a rather highly extra-ordinary
turn of events.” [5]
These
are not light accusations to be made at the highest court in the
land, and to recklessly raise them in court, and claim a lot of
interest in its pursuit, whilst insisting on it is the most
perfidious thing any plaintiff can do to the stability, and peace of
this country, as well as to our Supreme Court. It is not like the
sharing of state lands among NPP functionaries and leading members,
where one can withdraw without any repercussions. The arguments they
advanced cited grave issues and concerns which, according to them,
have not even changed, yet they want to brush these fundamental
issues aside, and proceed with a judgement! Is it a way of
engineering a window of escape into mayhem, death and destruction,
should the judgement go against the NPP? They must be made to
formerly withdraw and apologize for the attempt to smear the court,
or ordered to proceed with that motion!
Withdrawing
the allegations and rendering unqualified apologies is something the
NPP ought to have done on its own without even being told to do so by
others. The reason is simple. It even has a name. It is called “good
manners”. You can not accuse someone of murder and then turn around
to arrogantly say you have no time to present the evidence when
ordered by a competent court to do so! What makes this even worse is
that far from an apology, they still insist their concerns have not
changed, so they are even unable to render sincere apologies! As Nana
Ato Dadzie recently pointed out, an apology is required, most
especially after the General Secretary of the NPP, Kwadwo Owusu
Afriyie, had threatened to expose the judge they objected to, which
the NDC have speculated to be Mr William Atuguba, with ‘more
challenging things’. According to him, the “horrendous”
statements made by Mr Owusu Afriyie, moment after the objection was
raised in court, should as well be condemned.
Nana
Ato Dadzie's observation that the procedures used by the NPP to raise
the objection and rescinding it were wrong, makes perfect sense.
“You will have to ask the registrar, by way of a letter, to have
the court sit and then you bring a formal application withdrawing
your objection... what happens to the written order? There must be
record that the written order itself has been revoked” How does the
court revoke the order when the NPP maintains it still stands by
those accusations? I hope they receive a good dressing by the Supreme
Court for such an unacceptable behaviour, which contributes more as a
threat to the sanctity and the integrity of the Judiciary than their
perceived concerns!
I
just learned that Nana Ato Dadzie, a counsel member of the NDC that
is seeking to join the petition, speaking on Joy FM’s news analysis
programme Newsfile contended: “You accused a panel of likelihood of
bias and you don’t name the person, you put all nine judges in a
problematic position…into disrepute”, and so following the order
of the court asking the NPP to file a motion, the proper thing to do,
if they seek to withdraw their motion, is to go back to the Lords to
to render unqualified apologies to judges at the Supreme Court,
especially Justice William Atuguba, for embarking on an action that
sought to injure the integrity of the panel to hear the NPP’s
petition against the 2012 election results.
“If
you’ve changed your mind, the proper thing to do is to go before
the nine judges and say, Lord we are on our kneels, we apologize…
That is the more honourable thing to do... All the nine judges,
particularly Justice Atuguba and the people of this country are
entitled to an unqualified apology from the legal team that went to
make some allegations of impropriety against the judges to frustrate
and delay this trial,” he insisted. [6]
I
also like the way a commentator on Ghanaweb, General de Gaule put it:
“Their concerns have not been addressed so how can they be allowed
to rescind their decision? The only legal basis for rescinding their
decision is for them to accept that it was unfounded and not because
they want an expeditious hearing. Justice cannot be sacrificed at the
altar of expediency. They must come up with a formal objection or
accept that it was unfounded.” [7]
This is a serious
development and must be nipped in the bud before it germinates to
cause trouble in the future. The fact that the NPP insists upon even
not apologizing for what could probably amount to a contempt makes
the call for apologies even more urgent. In sharp contrast to Nana
Ato Dadzie's call on the NPP to apologize for the disgraceful
performance, Mr. Faibille, stated that looking at the case the NPP
has presented before the Supreme Court, it would totally be wrong for
them to make a fuss about Mr. Dadzie’s “red herrings”. Lawyer
Egbert Faibille proceeded to counsel Nana Ato Dadzie to remain
“focused” instead of trying to offer moral tutorials to his
political opponents:
“Nana Ato Dadzie must
focus on his work for the NDC’s legal team and leave the NPP to
prosecute their case. I think that when a case is before court, it is
beneficial to focus on it rather than the mere shenanigans. There is
no use and if the NPP doesn’t apologize, what can he do,what can
Nana Ato Dadzie do?” he inquired." [8]
“More
worrying is the concerns by a section of the public that the intended
public education by IDEG and GBA would in lieu of enhancing public
knowledge on electoral adjudication, be pouring more fire in the
already polarised public discussion of the matter which has already
been laid before the Supreme Court, and thereby raising fears of
prejudicing the court’s proceedings.
Coming
at the heels of last Thursday’s drama at the Supreme Court where
the NPP had requested an In-camera hearing after questioning the
credibility of a panel member only to turn down an order to state the
protestation, it is suspected that the intervention by IDEG and GBA
is a ploy, calculated to undermine the eventual verdict of the Court
and as a way of preparing the minds of the Public to reject the
outcome of the court’s decision.
Even
before the dust settles on his quick u-turn from citing reasons they
opposed the membership of the panel assembled by Her Lord Chief
Justice, Georgina Theodora Wood to hear their election petition, the
Ghana BAR Association and the Institute of Democratic Governance
(IDEG) have offered themselves to be used as their grey-knight. The
two groups heavily perceived to be politically aligned to the NPP has
announced their intention to embark on a series of public education
under the disguise of sensitizing the public on the mandate of the
Supreme Court.” [9]
The painful aspect of
it all is that, they all claim to be legal luminaries! As to what
they are taking Ghanaians for, only God knows! They must be made to
feel so dizzy that they will think twice or more, before they present
another vexatious petition and begin to abuse the Judiciary the next
time around! They must either substantiate or be made to
categorically withdraw, apologize to God and country, and to commit
themselves to for ever hold their peace!
Forward Ever! Backwards
Never!
For Life, the
Environment, and Social Justice!
Nana Akyea Mensah,
Ghana Steering Committee, P-AI, Social Media Campaigns | January 12,
2013
SocialMedia@panafricanistinternational.org - Pan-Africanist International - a grammar of Pan-Africanism and its manners of articulation! www.panafricanistinternational.org
SocialMedia@panafricanistinternational.org - Pan-Africanist International - a grammar of Pan-Africanism and its manners of articulation! www.panafricanistinternational.org
REFERENCES:
[1]
Statement: Nana Akufo-Addo on the filing
of the Supreme Court petition,
From: Myjoyonline.com, Published On: December 28, 2012, 12:22 GMT |
Politics http://politics.myjoyonline.com/pages/news/201212/99238.php
[2] NPP’s
U-turn raises more questions – Kofi Abotsi | Politics
http://politics.myjoyonline.com/pages/news/201301/99801.php
[3] It
is for the integrity of judiciary we wanted in-camera hearing -
Gloria Akuffo, By Ghana l
Myjoyonline.com, General News | 10 January 2013,
http://www.modernghana.com/news/439008/1/it-is-for-the-integrity-of-judiciary-we-wanted-in-.html
[4] NPP’s
U-turn raises more questions – Kofi Abotsi | Politics
http://politics.myjoyonline.com/pages/news/201301/99801.php
[5] NPP group calls on Justice Atuguba to
recuse himself, General News of Tuesday, 15 January 2013, Source:
Joy Online:
http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=262120&comment=0#com
[6] NPP legal team must apologise to Atuguba et
al – Nana Ato Dadzie, General News of Saturday, 12 January
2013, Source: Joy Online:
http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=261962&comment=0#com
[7] Comment: NO WHERE TO HIDE, Author: GENERAL
DeGAULE Date: 2013-01-14 04:02:18, Comment to: Akufo-Addo’s
legal weakness exposed again, General News of Monday, 14 January
2013, Source: The Herald Newspaper:
http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=262069&comment=8776101#com
[8] NPP Won’t Take Lessons In Morality From
Nana Ato Dadzie - Egbert Faibille, General News of Tuesday, 15
January 2013, Source: peacefmonline:
http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=262177&comment=0#com
[9]
Akufo Addo Election Fraud Intrigues, General News of Tuesday,
15 January 2013, Source: The Republic,
http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=262176&comment=0#com
Sunday, November 25, 2012
“Akufo-Addo Subverts Ghanaian Interests At The IEA Debate!” - Kwesi Pratt, Jnr.
Mr.
Kwesi Pratt, Jnr. takes the host of Radio Gold, Mr. Alhassan Shaibu
Suhini, host of the famous Alhaji & Alhaji Show through an
analysis of the essential bankruptcy that underlies the foreign policy
postures of the presidential candidate of Ghana's opposition party,
Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo, of the New Patriotic Party, NPP at the
Institute of Economic Affairs' recent Presidential debate at the
Banquet Hall, State House, Accra, Ghana. Transcript
by the Office of The Odikro, Nana Akyea Mensah. Listen: ▶ KWESI
PRATT ON THE IEA DEBATE NOV 2012 by Pan-Africanist International.
http://soundcloud.com/pan-africanisr-internatio/kwesi-pratt-on-the-iea-debate#
KWESI PRATT JNR.:
“I feel so uncomfortable about the fact that the discussion of
foreign policy was reduced to a discussion about our relationship
with La Côte
d'Ivoire. Because foreign policy is much, much, more broader! Much,
much more broader than our relations with La Côte d'Ivoire. And yet
Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo managed to reduce the whole discussion
to our relations with La Côte d'Ivoire, and I felt it was hugely
problematic.
I
think that foreign policy issues are essentially about how to
maximise our advantage in the comity of nations. Foreign policy is
simply the appreciation of the fact that no country has everything it
needs in terms of resources and so on. And therefore, it is important
to relate to the rest of the world so that we can deal with the
things that we are not capable of dealing, and so that we can also
help others overcome problems which confront them, for which we have
an advantage. That is the basis of foreign policy.
Again,
I think that foreign policy ought to have ingredients. And if you
look at Ghana's foreign policy from 1957, one of the key ingredients
in Ghana's foreign policy has been international justice. The search
for justice, the struggle to end exploitation, whether it is in the
form of slavery, whether it is in the form of classical colonialism,
or it is in the form of modern day neo-colonialism. And that is why
Ghana has been firmly committed to the decolonisation process
throughout the world. The element of international justice is key in
foreign policy. And that was skipped.
Now
with reference to La Côte d'Ivoire, I am surprised that anybody
discussing the relations between Ghana and La Côte d'Ivoire could
ignore the claim that our oil resources, or part of our oil resources
belong to La Côte d'Ivoire! Over the last year or two, La Côte
d'Ivoire has made all kinds of claims on Ghana's Jubilee Field, to
the extent that the Ivorian National Petroleum Company issued a
threat to the operators in the Jubilee Field to stop work or face the
consequences.
Now,
any Ghanaian with an interest in the protection of Ghana's resources
and its utilization for the development of our people if he wants to
comment about the relationship with La Côte d'Ivoire ought to focus
some attention on the claims of the Ouattara Administration that part
or all of our oil resources belong to them. Nana Akufo-Addo was not
interested in that. His main interest was how to keep Ouattara in
power. And as a Ghanaian, I am totally disgusted by this picture of a
man who wants to be the President of the Republic of Ghana!
He
is not interested in the Ivorian claims at all! But, you know what
makes it worse? When Nana Akufo-Addo was asked how he would find
resources to support his free Senior High School proposal, he said it
would be revenue form the oil. Now, if that is the case, just in case
La Côte d'Ivoire succeeded in claiming a substantial part of our oil
resources, it would mean that the free SHS proposal have collapsed
at birth. And yet Nana Akufo-Addo is not interested in protecting
source of the resources he would use to fund the free SHS system that
he has proposed. That is how serious he appears to be about the free
SHS! The very source of funding, he is not interested in protecting,
and I find that worrying.
My
brother, it is interesting for us to go back into history. And it is
interesting for us to go back into history because in this very
instance, history will teach us why the New Patriotic Party and its
Presidential candidate, is jumping over itself to have a
collaborative relationship with the Ouattara Administration, even if
it means subverting Ghana's interests. And I recommend very strongly
that those who can, should try and read Mahoney's book, “JFK,
Ordeal in Africa”. I think that portion starts from page 185
onwards. They should try and read that. Nkrumah's government suffered
tremendously as a result of sabotage, planned and executed by the
Danquah -Busia elements, with the full support of the
Houphouët-Boigny
government in La Côte d'Ivoire.
Throughout
Nkrumah's reign, he never had a day of peace, as a result of the
subversion of the Danquah-Busia elements and the reactionary
neo-colonialist government of La Côte d'Ivoire, headed by
Houphouët-Boigny,
a government in which Ouattara served. A government in which Ouattara
served!
Today,
in Dansoman, lives a woman called Asantewa. And I am sure all of you
know the story of Asantewa. Asantewa was a young school girl, Young
Pioneer, for that matter, who went to the Accra Sports Stadium to
participate in an activity that Nkrumah was to address. Danquah-Busia
elements stormed the stadium with bombs in one of their terrorist
activities, and Asantewa had one of her legs amputated. Today, you
should see Asantewa. The other leg is so badly swollen, and up till
today, Asantewa is in extreme pains. Those bombs came from La Côte
d'Ivoire and other countries, but they came principally from La Côte
d'Ivoire!
Again,
it is important to go back into history and to learn. And Dr. Tony
Aidoo mentioned that but Dr. Tony Aidoo did not mention the role
played by La Côte d'Ivoire! Busia's government teamed up with La
Côte d'Ivoire to subvert the aspirations of the African people with
regards to toppling Apartheid, when the Organisation of African
Unity, had come to the conclusion that Apartheid needed to be
uprooted, and that one of the means of uprooting Apartheid was to
isolate Apartheid and to impose sanctions on Apartheid.
The
Danquah-Busia elements in Ghana and Houphouët-Boigny's government in
La Côte d'Ivoire, decided to subvert the Organisation of African
Unity, and opened up trade links and other diplomatic links with
South Africa to the shame and horror of Africans everywhere in the
world! So the collaboration did not begin today! It began a long time
ago, working against the interests of the African people!
Now,
you see a discussion of La Côte d'Ivoire crisis has been skewed in
such a way as to create the impression that Laurent Gbagbo was some
kind of monster who needed to be booted out of power. I totally
disagree with any analysis like that, no matter where that analysis
is coming from! Why? The electoral regulations of La Côte d'Ivoire,
the Constitution of La Côte d'Ivoire, allowed any of the contesting
parties to ask for a recount of the votes. In much the same way that
Ghanaian electoral laws and the Constitution allow for a recount of
votes. You understand what I am saying?
At
the end of that election, the only demand made by the Gbagbo
Administration was that the results should be recounted. And Gbagbo
stated very clearly that if those results were recounted and he had
lost, he was willing to leave power. So it was not a case of Gbagbo
hanging on blindly to power. It was a case in which Gbagbo said, let
us recount the ballots, in conformity with the Ivorian Constitution,
in conformity with Ivorian electoral laws.
Alassane
Ouattara said no! Daabi
da!
We will not allow the recount! If you don't leave office, we will
bomb
you to ras! And don't forget that before the elections, the rebels
supporting Alassane Ouattara had been armed to the teeth, ready to
shoot their way to power. That is what happened in La Côte d'Ivoire!
Because Gbagbo insisted on the proper things being done, and Alassane
Ouattara objected to the proper things being done, more than 3000
Ivorian citizens lost their lives! Many of them killed by rebels
supporting Ouattara.
You
should be reading reports of Human Rights Watch. You should be
reading reports of Amnesty International. And since they love UN
reports, you should be reading UN reports. In one day, the rebels
supporting Ouattara killed more than 200 innocent Ivorians who were
taking refuge in a church! Isn't it interesting that today Gbagbo is
standing trial in The Hague for crimes against humanity? The wife has
just been indicted also, and Alassane Ouattara is walking free! Isn't
that interesting? That is justice! I am disgusted! Completely
disgusted!
But
Suhini, back to the point. Guillaume Soro was in Accra. Guillaume
Soro was a Prime Minister, now he is the Speaker of the Ivorian
Parliament. And Guillaume Soro said that the Ivorian government was
eternally grateful to Professor Mills for helping to resolve the
crisis of the Ivory coast. Guillaume Soro said if it was not for the
wise counsel of Professor Mills, the Ivorian crisis could not have
been resolved.
Guillaume
Soro's visit was followed by a visit by President Ouattara. And
President Ouattara made it clear that President Mills had played a
key role in the resolution of the Ivorian conflict. I interviewed
Laurent Gbagbo. And Laurent Gbagbo said that President Mills was one
of the wisest leaders in Africa. Ouattara repeated that. The opponent
of Laurent Gbagbo came to Accra and repeated that and said, look,
President Mills was one of the wisest African leaders, and that
without him, the crisis could not have been resolved.
Apparently,
Nana Akufo-Addo did not listen to all of this. The man who was so
interested in protecting Ivorian interests and so on, did not even
listen to his mentor Ouattara, when Ouattara praised President Mills
to this level, and went on to make the kind of statements he made at
the IEA.
But
my brother, listen to me and listen to me carefully. Nana Akufo-Addo
claims to have read the UN report. I don't think he has read the UN
report because anybody who has read the UN report would notice that
the UN report was quoting from a French intelligence company! And
indeed, some of the quotations were in quotation marks. Clearly
indicating that the UN, whilst using the report, was distancing
itself from the report. It was not adopting the report as its own.
The fact that they were in quotation marks is clear. But Nana
Akufo-Addo would have us believe that that report was a UN report!
There
is something also which is interesting about that so-called UN
report. One, it was leaked even before it had been presented to the
UN for adoption, you understand what I am saying? So, is that what
Nana Akufo-Addo is going to base his policy on? Leaked documents
which do not have the stamp of approval and so on? Is that what he is
going to base his foreign policy on? I wonder what Ghana will become!
We will be moving towards a banana republic if this is going to be
our attitude in foreign policy!
But,
be that as it may. Nana Akufo-Addo, who has been a Foreign Minister
before, should be familiar with the UN Charter and other regulations.
The UN is estopped by its own Charter from carrying out espionage
activities in member countries. So, the UN could not have sent secret
agents quietly into Ghana to establish the things that the French
company established. It is against the UN Charter!
Now,
if the UN is violating its own Charter and operating as if it were a
band of guerilla movement and so on, we expect Ghanaian people,
especially those who want to be our President, to defend Ghana's
interests, and not to insist that the UN should behave properly!
Unfortunately, we have a man who wants to be President of Ghana, who
is condoning the violation of the UN's own Charter. And I am worried
about this development.
In
any case, Radio France International had an interview with an Ivorian
military officer, in charge of the area where the so-called rebels
were supposed to have attacked from Ghana and so on. We published it
in The Insight, I am sure you saw it, in which the officer stated
clearly that there was no Ghanaian involvement, and that the
territory which was described as being Ghanaian territory was indeed
an Ivorian territory, and that the attack came from within La Côte
d'Ivoire! A La Côte d'Ivoire army officer! Nana Akufo-Addo did not
hear that. He does not want to hear that! He is interested in
subverting Ghana's interests and so on. And I am so, so disgusted by
this development!
Now,
I can say more about La Côte d'Ivoire because for me, it represents
a betrayal of Ghanaian interests. The posture taken by Akufo-Addo is
a clear betrayal of Ghanaian interests! Now, why would any
Presidential candidate betray his own country, and route for another
country? Of course, there are so many rumours about the linkage
between Nana Akufo-Addo and some of the people in La Côte d'Ivoire.
Some of it have been published. I am not the one to repeat these
allegations, but you see, this conduct at the IEA can only lend
credence to some of those rumours!
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Nana Akyea Mensah distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C ß 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this blog for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Friday, November 16, 2012
Why Was Akufo-Addo Dismissed From Oxford University? Part Two,
Part
Two, By Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
I have a feeling that there is going to be an announcement soon,
trying to do as much damage control as possible, over these latest
revelations concerning the circumstances under which young Master
William Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo left Oxford University in the 1962/63
academic year. About a year ago, James Kwabena Bomfe, popularly known
as Kabila stated categorically:
“For a
fact Nana Addo never went to Oxford; he never got admission or
applied to go to Oxford. It is his father who went to Oxford”.
The
paper also notes, “Kabila as Bomfe is popularly
called, said that the NPP flag-bearer has refused to comment on the
issue because he (Nana) is treating it with the contempt it
deserves.”
Akufo Addo's contempt
has expired because more and more Ghanaians are beginning to demand
answers, with the revelation that indeed, “Mr
William Addo Dankwa AKUFO-ADDO was a member of the University (and of
New College) during the 1962/63 academic year'.” [Why has Nana
Akufo Addo omitted Oxford University from his Profile? -
ModernGhana.com
http://www.modernghana.com/news/429126/1/why-has-nana-akufo-addo-omitted-oxford-university-.html]
This is why I expect him to finally clear his throat and say
something about it, or sink with it. I wouldn't bet too much on it
though. The refusal to acknowledge defeat, fault, or apologize for
some wrong-doing appears to be so much alien in Nana Akufo-Addo's
nature to such an extent that no other person than his own cousin,
Mr. Gabriel Asare Otchere-Darko, the Executive Director of the
Danquah Institute had this to say about the reason why Nana Addo lost
the 2008 Presidential elections:
"The political opponents of the Danquah-Dombo-Busiasts have always been better at saying, “Ghanaians don't need a president who is arrogant and looks down on them. They need a president who stands up for them. One who feels their pain.” These words were successfully used against a man who for more than 30 years (more than any of his rivals in the 2008 contest) dedicated his time, money, energy and intellect to fighting for the cause of the masses – Nana Akufo-Addo, an Akyem aristocrat." (See: "Are Danquah-Busiasts Really Elitist?", by danquahinstitute.org, Wednesday, 18 November 2009.)
One of the first steps Nana Addo took to dispel this perception of
“arrogance” was to board “tro tro” bus from Nima Lorry Park
to the Kwame Nkrumah Circle. But when it comes to heeding calls to
withdraw ethnocentric statements, or statements inciting inter-ethnic
conflict and calling for war, such as “all die be die”, he has
been more than deaf! Not even when the Upper West branch of his own
party felt offended by his use of “goats” in reference to them,
did he bother to apologize!
As Joseph Conrad would have put it, “it will be very interesting
for science” to see a humble Nana Akufo-Addo taking questions and
throwing some light on this. The funny thing is that I know they are
going to have to do it if they ever want to cross the bridge to the
Presidency. That insurmountable bridge is to restore the confidence
of Ghanaians who are asking so many questions, as to whether or not
this is a man to be trusted! That is why I know they do not have a
choice, but as usual, they will never respond until it is too late!
The latest appeal in town is: “Judge Not Akufo-Addo By His Past!"
I can understand such appeals, if he comes clean with his past and
does not lie about it in the present. All the excuses that mention
names of famous politicians who either smoked and or inhaled the
stuff, do not mean much, because, at least, all these politicians
either confessed or lied about it publicly. They did not “treat it
with the contempt that it deserves! So far the NPP strategy is to
keep quiet about it and expect us not to judge him with his past! The
issue is not one of his past. It is one of his present: can we trust
a man who is lying about his past?
In fact, it was no other person than ex-President J. A Kufour, who actually made that observation for the first time:
"Mr Kufuor noted that it was not appropriate to judge people based on what they did or did not do in the past, adding that Ghanaians should not judge Nana Akufo-Addo with things he is perceived to have done in the past."
With all due respect, is the President suggesting this for all of us or only an exceptional treatment for Nana Akufo-Addo? If so, does he not think it would have been wiser to have also explained why we are all judged by our past actions rather than our intentions for the future but not Akufo-Addo? Would he be saying this if he were to be proud of Akufo-Addo's past? Why is it not appropriate to base our judgement on what Akufo-Addo "did or did not do in the past"? It is ridiculous to admonish us that "Ghanaians should not judge Nana Akufo-Addo with things he is perceived to have done in the past." Are we to judge him with the things he is going to do in the future? This is a good one! This is new, fresh and original!
The reason why he is making this bizarre request for us to forget about the past is not far-fetched:
"Former President Kufuor urged the electorate to support Nana Akufo-Addo’s bid to become the next president of the country by voting massively for the NPP presidential candidate in next year’s general election." [ See: Kufuor: "Judge Not Akufo-Addo By His Past!" | http://opinion.myjoyonline.com/pages/articles/201109/73550.php]
The whole
point is that maybe we are willing to forgive, but the main obstacle
in our way is that it is difficult to forgive a liar who is still
telling the same lie. This is why it is important for Akufo-Addo
himself to clear the air. This is probably not as easy as a “tro
tro” ride, but it might help to dispel perceptions of arrogance.
Please Nana, come forward and clear the air, you have everything to
win from this! Any prolonged silence will spell nothing but the end
of your political career. It is entirely up to you, as your nephew,
Kwame Okoampa-Ahoofe, Jr, puts it, "A word to the wise can never
be enough; else there would be no fools, to begin with!"
Forward Ever! Backwards Never! Long live Ghana!
Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
Give me a follow on twitter: twitter.com/TheOdikro
Monday, November 12, 2012
Why Was Akufo-Addo Dismissed From Oxford University?
Part One, By Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
It is
fitting and proper that Ghanaians want to know about the character
and the integrity of any individual who offers himself for public
office. Truth telling is fundamental in establishing trust. Massaging
the details of one's past and telling lies by omission or commission
erodes such a trust. It is for this reason that the issue of whether
or not the NPP Presidential candidate, Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo's
silence over his stint at Oxford University raises many an eye brow.
I am writing this piece to call on Nana Akufo-Addo to come clean with
Ghanaians and do the right thing by spilling the beans in order to
urgently restore his own credibility.
I just read an
interesting article by a conscientious
Ghanaian who is also non-partisan, which brings into a sharp focus as
to why Akufo-Addo has remained dead silence on his stint at Oxford
University in the 1962/63 academic year. If Nana Akufo-Addo was
betting on his ability to cover up such a juicy story in this
information age, he better think again, and plan an appropriate
damage control. An authoritative feature article by Mr. Kofi Ata,
published 11 November 2012, has the title: “Why has Nana Akufo Addo
omitted Oxford University from his Profile?”
“I can confirm on
authority that, I submitted Freedom of Information Request (FOI) to
Oxford University in January 2012 asking the university to confirm if
Mr William Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo also known as Nana Akufo Addo was a
student at the university. The university in a reply dated 27 January
2012 (Ref. FOI/2012/Jan), stated as follows: 'We have searched our
records and the only published information that falls within the
scope of your request is that Mr William Addo Dankwa AKUFO-ADDO was a
member of the University (and of New College) during the 1962/63
academic year'.” [Why has Nana Akufo Addo omitted Oxford University
from his Profile? - ModernGhana.com
http://www.modernghana.com/news/429126/1/why-has-nana-akufo-addo-omitted-oxford-university-.html]
Even though it has been
an open secret that Nana Addo Danquah Akufo-Addo did set his feet at
Oxford as a student, the NPP has been adamant that Nana never went to
Oxford. Mr. Ata checked with Oxford to find out the truth when Kabila
categorically denied that Akufo-Addo had ever set foot at Oxford:
“He revealed that
Nana Akufo-Addo was never a student at Oxford University as it is
being alleged.
'For a fact Nana Addo
never went to Oxford; he never got admission or applied to go to
Oxford. It is his father who went to Oxford'. Kabila as Bomfe is
popularly called, said that the NPP flag-bearer has refused to
comment on the issue because he (Nana) is treating it with the
contempt it deserves.” [Where is Nana Addo’s Oxford University
record? Felix Kwakye quizzes | Ghanamma.com
http://www.ghanamma.com/2011/12/where-is-nana-addos-oxford-university-record-felix-kwakye-quizzes/]
By the
time of the IEA debate, Mr. Kofi Ata had been fully informed by the
that,
yes, indeed, Akufo-Addo was enrolled at Oxford University “and of
New College) during the 1962/63 academic year”. It must have come
as a big surprise and quite curious that Akufo-Addo virtually
mentioned all the schools he attended, including Primary school, but
omitted his enrolment at Oxford University. Now, why would he want to
hide that? Is he ashamed of the University? What is wrong with being
at Oxford for a almost one academic year?
Akufo-Addo
has carefully doctored all his records to toe a certain line. They
all exclude mentioning his days in Oxford. Even Wikipedia stands
unchallenged! I urge Mr. Ata to help in up-dating the information on
wikipedia as they are based on facts. So far this is what we have
there:
“Early life and education: ...Akufo-Addo received his primary
education at the Government Boys School and later at the Rowe Road
School (now Kinbu) both in Accra Central. He went on to England
to study for his O
Level and A
Level examinations. Akufo-Addo returned to Ghana in 1962 to teach
at the Accra
Academy before going to the University
of Ghana in 1964 to read economics.
After graduating as an economist, he went on to read Law
in the UK and was called to the English
Bar (Middle
Temple) in July 1971 and then the Ghana Bar in 1975.” [Nana
Akufo-Addo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nana_Akufo-Addo]
The reason for this
large-scale attempt at a cover-up is not far-fetched. Exactly a year
ago, on Friday, 9th December 2011, in “Where is Nana
Addo’s Oxford University record? Felix Kwakye quizzes” we read:
“A member of the
communication team of the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC),
Felix Kwaye Ofosu has questioned the motive behind Nana Akufo-Addo’s
exclusion of his academic credential at Oxford University from his
curriculum vitae.
According to him, the opposition New Patriotic
Party (NPP) flag-bearer’s refusal to make public his academic
performance in Oxford University gives credence to rumours that he
(Nana) was sacked from the institution for smoking marijuana.”
The story of
wee-smoking has been collaborated in several unrelated sources. The
most famous of them all was from an old friend who in trying to
defend him from more serious charges of cocaine abuse, admitted the
lesser crime of marijuana smoking. This is what the Wikileaks
say:
"¶3...When questioned about persistent rumors of Akufo-Addo's own cocaine habit, Pratt admitted that he had personal knowledge of the candidate's drug use, but that it was not cocaine. "Nana used to smoke a lot of marijuana," Pratt said, "and I'm telling you, a lot. Even in the morning, there used to be a cloud around him and you could see that he was high. But I never saw him do cocaine, and I think that is just an assumption people made."
"¶3...When questioned about persistent rumors of Akufo-Addo's own cocaine habit, Pratt admitted that he had personal knowledge of the candidate's drug use, but that it was not cocaine. "Nana used to smoke a lot of marijuana," Pratt said, "and I'm telling you, a lot. Even in the morning, there used to be a cloud around him and you could see that he was high. But I never saw him do cocaine, and I think that is just an assumption people made."
In another development,
Dr. Kwesi Aning, another very respected security analyst who is head
of Research at the Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping Centre,
and an NPP sympathiser, was quoted to have
admitted that Akufo-Addo had used drugs in his younger days, but that
was now "under control." He
added cryptically that "you can check with German intelligence
on that." Apparently, the only people unaware of this habit is
the average Ghanaian voter. This is why we need Akufo-Addo to confirm
that, indeed he was sacked from Oxford University, after being caught
smoking wee, so that we will know what to do on the 6th
of December, 2012. One thing is sure: his continued silence on this
issue is no longer helpful, and he risks automatic rejection with the
contempt that an arrogant, unrepentant and lying wee-smoker deserves!
Forward Ever! Backwards Never! Long live Ghana!
Nana Akyea Mensah, The Odikro.
Give
me a follow on twitter: twitter.com/TheOdikro
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)